FUNDRAISING, FEDERALISM, AND DONOR PRIVACY
Since I’ve become a full-time fundraising consultant, I’ve been thinking a lot about federalism.
I hold a PhD in political science. You may at this point think: “So that explains the federalism comment. Who but a poli sci wonk would connect fundraising and federalism,” right?
But you’d be wrong.
With the publication last week of BoardSource’s updated Ten Basic Responsibilities of Board Members, I’ve been thinking a lot about Crutchfield and Grant’s seminal Forces for Good book. The Ten Basic Responsibilities of Board Members list of the core, fundamental, legal responsibilities of a Board member has been gospel for all of us for many years. Most of us have relied on this list to orient our board members and to explain board members’ responsibilities for new members.
When BoardSource changed this list last week, BoardSource didn’t make the number of items on the list longer, but what it did do is determine that ADVOCACY is a core responsibility of Board Members. The responsibility to advocate for the mission is added to the first core responsibility (to determine an organization’s mission and purpose) and discussions of advocacy are added to several other responsibilities such as the responsibility to enhance an organization’s public standing.